Measles Virus Disproved in Bombshell German Court Ruling

Measles Virus Disproved in Bombshell German Court Ruling

This article (“Measles Virus Disproved in Bombshell German Court Ruling”) is original copyrighted material belonging to Global Freedom Movement and may be re-posted freely in full, with proper (clickable) attribution, with all hyperlinks, author name and bio, and this copyright statement intact.

measles virus disproved

By Brendan D. Murphy, Global Freedom Movement founder

Measles Virus Disproved ?

Some of the biggest news in science and medicine in years – maybe even decades – has just broken out of Germany: the existence of the measles virus has just taken a major blow and may – just may – have just been disproved.

In November 2011, biologist Stefan Lanka bravely challenged the scientific community to offer real empirical and definitive proof that the measles virus actually exists. He was so certain that belief in the existence of this virus – a widespread and entrenched belief simply taken for granted – was without foundation that he offered a prize of 100,000 euros to anyone who could offer laboratory proof of identification and a measurement of the diameter of the virus.

The challenge was soon taken up by David Bardens and the matter pursued in the German legal system for several years to determine whether the plaintiff/claimant had succeeded in scientifically proving that the measles virus actually exists to the specifications of Lanka’s challenge. Bardens submitted six publications1 that he asserted constituted proof of the virus and shortly thereafter demanded the reward be paid, involving an attorney.

Lanka did not concede and the matter went to court. On April 10th, 2014, the Lanka v Bardens case began in Ravensburg’s district court and a long and complicated saga featuring many odd turns and accusations – and an initial ruling against Lanka – unfolded thereafter.

On February 16th, 2016, the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart reevaluated the first ruling and concluded that Bardens formally failed to meet the criteria of the “bet” set out by Lanka. Bardens took the case to the German Federal Supreme Court in Karlsruhe in early-to-mid-2016 in hopes of finally securing the prize money he believed was his.

Lanka v Bardens: Lanka Wins

virus mania book How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense torsten engelbrecht global freedom movementHowever, just days ago (Jan. 2017), the court ruled on the matter. The verdict: Lanka’s hefty prize would not be paid out. Bardens’ claim was denied. Had a cherished medical dogma just been obliterated (or at least seriously challenged)? If so, the ramifications are nothing less than enormous.

The First Civil Senate of the Federal Supreme Court (BGH) confirmed the prior judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) from February 16th, 2016. Not only does Lanka NOT have to pay, but Bardens was also ordered to pay court costs as well. Ouch.

Biologist Stefan Lanka has recently reported on the measles legal saga, informing us that five experts had been involved in the case and presented the results and analysis of six key scientific studies presented by Bardens that were used to make the case for the measles virus. The five experts, including Prof. Dr. Andreas Podbielski, “consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.”1 Podbielski was employed at the Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygene, Rostock. (Bardens, by contrast, was yet to obtain a doctorate.)

Could the entire idea of a measles virus just be yet another momentous medical bungle / SNAFU? You can practically hear the Big Pharma heart palpitations already.

Has Genetics Destroyed a Cherished Myth?

During the trial, the results of genetic research into the supposed measles virus were produced.

Two recognised laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently.The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.

Because of this error, during decades of consensus building process, normal cell constituents were mentally assembled into a model of a measles virus. To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved.2

Crucially – and fatally – the authors of the six measles virus publications (and their supporters), it was confirmed, did not conduct any control experiments, and thus failed to adhere to scientific “best practice.” Dr. Podbielski explicitly confirmed this. This error, according to Lanka, became the foundation of belief in disease-causing viruses. As he says: “They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.”3 At best, the existence of a “measles virus” remains unproved; at worst, disproved and demolished, an embarrassment to science and medicine.

What of Measles Vaccination Programs?

Based on the foregoing, you might be wondering what exactly the scientific basis of measles vaccination is at this point. Lanka does not shy away from it – on the contrary:

Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which [scientifically] prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.4

Additionally, head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, has conceded that the “measles virus” actually contains normal cell components, such as ribosomes, and since the  measles vaccine is a “whole virus” vaccine, it therefore contains standard cellular structures. These are then injected directly into the recipient’s blood, bypassing all natural bodily defense mechanisms, triggering an unatural immune response, which leading experts have often compared to kicking a hornet’s nest.

“This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination,” states Lanka.5

The appointed court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions during legal proceedings that by the admission of the Robert Koch Institute that “measles virus” contains ribosomes, the measles virus theory had been falsified.

Furthermore, during the trial it was also put on the record that the Robert Koch Institute – the highest German authority in infectious diseases – contrary to its legal remit [as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG)], had failed to conduct scientific tests for the alleged measles virus and publish them. The RKI claimed that it had made so-called internal studies on the “measles virus,” yet it refuses to publish or hand over those results.6 Thus, the logical view of the RKI’s claim is that it’s just a face-saving cover story with no substance whatever, which is entirely typical of medical authorities when they’ve been caught in a lie.

Wait for the Spin to Kick In

How will Big Pharma and their medical proxies and apologists spin (or deny) this one? Or do they just ignore it and do one last grand measles scare campaign to sell as much of the already-produced measles vaccine batches as possible – and then let the myth fade quietly into the night, cutting their losses? Perhaps a beefed up global equivalent to “bird (or swine) flu”, such as “swine measles”? Or maybe something scarier is in order, something that really locks the terror in: “bat measles” – “Get the jab so you don’t get bit!”

This is one of many Big Pharma dominoes that will be falling in the coming months.

cdc spider measles virus disproved Let’s not forget that Trump just appointed RFK Jr to head up a vaccine safety and scientific integrity commission, so the issue of pharmaceutical product efficacy and safety is only going to become more prominent, doubtless with more bombshells to come (and more nosedives for pharma shares).

Just as Dr. William Thompson triggered an avalanche of whistleblower activity (see: CDC Spider) after he confessed to involvement in the fraudulent CDC studies that falsely claimed to discredit a vaccine-autism link (when in reality they confirmed that link!), I suspect that we will see some spectacular admissions, confessions, and exposés in the coming months.

President Trump, for one, seems intent on keeping things interesting.

Watch this space.

This article (“Measles Virus Disproved in Bombshell German Court Ruling”) is original copyrighted material belonging to Global Freedom Movement and may be re-posted freely in full, with proper (clickable) attribution, with all hyperlinks, author name and bio, and this copyright statement intact.


  1. The studies were:
    1. Enders JF, Peebles TC. Propagation in tissue cultures of cytopathogenic agents from patients with measles. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954 Jun;86(2):277–286.
    2. Bech V, Magnus Pv. Studies on measles virus in monkey kidney tissue cultures. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1959; 42(1): 75–85
    3. Horikami SM, Moyer SA. Structure, Transcription, and Replication of Measles Virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1995; 191: 35–50.
    4. Nakai M, Imagawa DT. Electron microscopy of measles virus replication. J Virol. 1969 Feb; 3(2): 187–97.
    5. Lund GA, Tyrell, DL, Bradley RD, Scraba DG. The molecular length of measles virus RNA and the structural organization of measles nucleocapsids. J Gen Virol. 1984 Sep;65 (Pt 9):1535–42.
    6. Daikoku E, Morita C, Kohno T, Sano K. Analysis of Morphology and Infectivity of Measles Virus Particles. Bulletin of the Osaka Medical College. 2007; 53(2): 107–14. (Source:
  3. Ibid.
  4. Ibid.
  5. Ibid.
  6. Ibid.
  7. Ibid.
    *Additional sources include some translations provided kindly by a German-speaking friend

Source: Measles Virus Disproved in Bombshell German Court Ruling | Global Freedom Movement

Other places to find me: