Political topic of climate change is a fraud

My take on the political topic of climate change

Have you read the latest statement from the UN that says we only got 12 years to limit climate change? Well I’m here to tell you that it’s all propaganda to serve a greater agenda which is about governments creating carbon taxes to fuel global programs like Agenda 21 / 2030 to get total control over natural resources and human activity.

Here is a list of reasons to why the political topic of climate change is a fraud from start to finish, I encourage people to check it out before dismissing it out of hand. It’s from journalists, researchers, politicians and climate scientists which include documents and leaked emails.

Note: Nobody is denying climate change or various environmental issues, what is being denied is that mankind is the cause, driver and contributor to climate change because of CO2 emissions.

Note: This is a living article meaning that it will be constantly updated with more sources of information.

“Uh oh. Top (former) UN Climate officials (Costa Rican diplomats with no scientific background) are “calculating” that if we don’t stop emitting carbon dioxide by 2020 the earth is doomed! That’s right: three years left to save the planet! Or is that 50 days? 96 months? Or were we doomed 5 years ago? Or was that 17 years ago? 4 days from now?…”

“Karl Popper famously said, “A theory that explains everything explains nothing.” So what do you make of the theory that catastrophic manmade CO2-driven “climate change” can account for harsher winters and lighter winters, more snow and less snow, droughts and floods, more hurricanes and less hurricanes, more rain and less rain, more malaria and less malaria, saltier seas and less salty seas, Antarctica ice melting and Antarctic ice gaining and dozens of other contradictions? Popper gave a name to “theories” like this: pseudoscience.”

“Retired climatologist Dr. Tim Ball joins us to discuss the significance of the recently leaked emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University which expose deceit, duplicity and collusion between climate researchers to maintain the fraud of the manmade global warming theory. These emails reveal stunning behind-the-scenes details about how this fraud has been developed and perpetuated, and Dr. Ball shares his insights on what they show.”

“This is not a call for complacency. In fact, now that the public is more skeptical than ever about the climategaters and others of their ilk, the danger of binding international agreements enacted by unelected institutions and empowering global taxation is at an all-time high. They are hoping to ram through an agreement that will put the final nail in the coffin of climate realism before the corpse of the global warming hoax even has the chance to rot. We have to speak out against this fraud now, and more loudly than ever. We must make our voices heard when we assert that science is about honesty, about openness, about the search for the truth, and that those who reject those principles will no longer be heeded by a public that has been stretched long past the point of credulity.”

“The IPCC has released its latest assessment of the state of climate science, and this time it’s even more dire than their 2007 assessment. Global warming is “unequivocal” and humans are the “dominant cause” to a certainty of 95%. But how are these uncertainties calculated? And how does the IPCC process work anyway? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we dissect the latest IPCC hype and examine the organizations processes and conclusions.”

“Maurice Strong may be dead, but unfortunately his legacy isn’t. Join James for today’s thought of the day as we break down the extraordinarily improbably life and times of the 14 year old dropout from Manitoba who became one of the 20th century’s key globalist supergophers and the father of the IPCC.”

“The average global temperature is…impossible to measure and harder to calculate than you might think. While GISS and RSS and UAH and GHCN might be a confusing jumble of letters to most people, there are people pushing for global taxes, global courts and individual carbon budgets based on these data sets. So let’s roll up our sleeves and take a look at the concept of “average global temperature.””

“Fact: the RSS global mean temperature anomaly dataset shows a least-squares linear regression trend of 0.0C from February 1997 to October 2015. But what does this really mean? And what is the significance of this global warming pause? Join me in today’s Thought For The Day as we explore this question.”

“Don’t you hate when Fox News and the other MSM spin-meisters use simple tricks to skew and misrepresent data and statistics? How about when the World Meteorological Organization does it? Or NASA? Or the Journal of Climate? Or GISS? Join James for today’s thought for the day as he shows you some of the grade school level parlour tricks the global warming alarmists use to misrepresent their data and bamboozle the public.”

“David Icke talks about The Climate Change Scam, What its really all about? The David Icke Videocast”

“Dr. Judith Curry, climate scientist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech, joins us once again today to discuss her comprehensive new report, “Climate Models for the layman.” We discuss the history and purpose of climate modeling, their uncertainties, equilibrium climate sensitivity, and what we can or cannot learn from their study.”

“Dr. Judith Curry is Professor and former Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Following is her verbal remarks as delivered to last week’s US Senate Commerce Committee Hearing on “Data or Dogma? Promoting Open Inquiry in the Debate Over the Magnitude of the Human Impact on Earth’s Climate.””

“Dr. Judith Curry is a climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology who went from the “high priestess of global warming” to a “climate heretic” after realizing she had been duped by the IPCC. Today she joins us to talk about her recent breakdown of Michael Polanyi’s 1962 article “The Republic of Science.” Topics discussed include the science/policy nexus, the breakdown of the old norms of scientific research, and how the internet is helping to revolutionize science.”

“Jim Steele was the Director of the Sierra Nevada Field Campus of San Francisco State University from 1985 to 2009. Having taught courses on plants, natural sciences, bird banding and bird identification, his research into the causes of the declines in local bird populations led him to the understanding that natural climate cycles and landscape changes were causing disruptions of wildlife populations. He went on to author a book, Landscapes & Cycles: An Environmentalist’s Journey to Climate Skepticism, and a website, LandscapesAndCycles.net where he explores how faulty, over-hyped C02-driven climate change fears are misdirecting environmental researchers and activists away from the true cause of environmental disruption.”

“Who controls the temperature datasets controls the past, and who controls the past controls the future. Welcome to the Orwellian world of temperature adjustments and climate alarmism. Sit up straight and buckle up tight, because this is consensus science as brought to you by Big Brother.”

“Oil. The 19th century was transformed by it. The 20th century was shaped by it. And the 21st century is moving beyond it. But who gave birth to the oil industry? What have they done with the immense wealth and power that it has granted them? And what are they planning to do with that power in a post-carbon world? This is the remarkable true story of the oiligarchs and the world they have created.”

“Previously on The Corbett Report we discussed the technocratic agenda of the Trilaterals and their globalist ilk with “Technocracy Rising” author Patrick Wood. Today Wood joins us once again to discuss the upcoming COP21 Climate Conference in Paris and how it plays into the technocrats’ plan to control the world’s resources and implement genocidal eugenics-based austerity.”

“James Corbett joins Dave of X22 Report to talk about the global warming narrative and its carbon ration end game. Topics discussed include the global average temperature construction, the carbon ration control grid, and the economics of technocracy.”

“As predicted, the IPCC has released their hot air report on 1.5C of global warming and the lamestream fake news lying establishment lapdog media is hyping it as the end of the world as we know it…unless you pay the globalists more money to atone for your carbon sins, of course. This week on #PropagandaWatch James breaks down the latest propaganda push for carbon eugenics and what it means for the coming technocratic slave state.”

“The Great Global Warming Swindle caused controversy in the UK when it premiered March 8, 2007 on British Channel 4. A documentary, by British television producer Martin Durkin, which argues against the virtually unchallenged consensus that global warming is man-made. A statement from the makers of this film asserts that the scientific theory of anthropogenic global warming could very well be “the biggest scam of modern times.” According to Martin Durkin the chief cause of climate change is not human activity but changes in radiation from the sun. Some have called The Great Global Warming Swindle the definitive retort to Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth. Using a comprehensive range of evidence it’s claimed that warming over the past 300 years represents a natural recovery from a ‘little ice age’.”

“Having debated people like Elizabeth May, Dr. Ball is a wealth of information on the subject. He debunks the 97% consensus which he points out, if there’s a consensus it’s not science. This all goes back to the United Nations, the IPCC and The Club of Rome with Maurice Strong, Gro Harlem Brundtland and others plotting to restrict industry, create a problem, a reaction and a solution and force the populace into complete dependency which we are seeing today with the green agenda. Of course government is the world’s biggest polluter and they have the nerve to tell us how to live with crippling taxes and regulation with very little to no understanding of the ramifications and real world problems.”

“This detailed presentation clearly explains the connection between sustainable development and Agenda 21 as defined by the UN. In depth research shows how Agenda 21 will ultimately compromise your property rights. “

“As an integral decade in this ongoing “Age of Transitions,” the 1970s brought with it previously unimagined sociopolitical and economic shifts. Deflation was prevalent. The decade also saw the rise of the Petrodollar and the end of the gold-backed Bretton Woods era, as well as the seeding of eugenic “environmental catastrophe” memes propagated by works like the Club of Rome’s 1972 publication, Limits to Growth, or John P. Holdren’s equally Neomalthusian and lauded Ecoscience. It also saw the birth of the Trilateral Commission, co-founded by David Rockefeller and Zbignew Brzezinski in 1973, who, among other things, pushed forth the concept of a “New International Economic Order” to quell the world’s ailing economic and environmental “doom and gloom” forecasts.”

Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21, Club of Rome, Sustainable Development, at the Lord Monckton Launch 2 Feb 2013 at the Adelaide Convention Centre.
Globalists, Climate Fraud & Agenda 21 – Senator Malcolm Roberts

For decades now, we have been told to be afraid of the long-term effects of manmade carbon dioxide on our climate. Seemingly every day some new storm, drought, warm spell or cold snap is featured on the news, with government-funded scientists warning us that this is a sign of things to come unless the world reduces its CO2 production.

The problem, of course, is that this is a third-rate scientific hoax propagated on the strength of the public’s ignorance of the underlying science, or lack thereof. The models and predictions used to scare the public into believing that CO2 is driving climate and will continue to do so in an increasingly dangerous fashion share the distinction of being universally wrong in their predictions of trends over the past 15 years, yet we are still asked to believe in the long-term validity of these same falsified models.

Technology To Control The Weather | Nick Begich

The following content has been added as a result of continued research.

Published on July 4, 2017

“Likely Repercussions for Science & Climate Policy

A bitter and embarrassing defeat for the self-styled ‘Nobel Prize winner’ who acted as if he was the epitome of virtue, this outcome shames not only Michael Mann, but puts the climate science community in crisis. Many hundreds of peer-reviewed papers cite Mann’s work, which is now effectively junked. Despite having deep-pocketed backers willing and able to feed his ego as a publicity-seeking mouthpiece against skeptics, Mann’s credibility as a champion of environmentalism is in tatters.

But it gets worse for the litigious Penn State professor. Close behind Dr Ball is celebrated writer Mark Steyn. Steyn also defends himself against another one of Mann’s SLAPP suits – this time in Washington DC. Steyn boldly claims Mann “has perverted the norms of science on an industrial scale.” Esteemed American climate scientist, Dr Judith Curry, has submitted to the court an Amicus Curiae legal brief exposing Mann. The world can now see that his six-year legal gambit to silence his most effective critics and chill scientific debate has spectacularly backfired.

But at a time of much clamor about ‘fake news,’ it seems climate scare stories will have a new angle now that the United States has officially stepped back from the Paris Climate Treaty. President Trump was elected on a mandate to weed out climate fraud so his supporters will point to this legal outcome as vindication for a full purge. It makes a mockery of statements made by Mann last February when PSI’s Hans Schreuder and John O’Sullivan publicly backed their colleague, Dr Ball and endorsed the revelations in his book. Mann reacted by moaning:

“It is difficult to keep up with this dizzying ongoing assault on science.”

The perpetrator of the biggest criminal “assault on science” has now become clear: Dr Mann, utterly damned by his contempt of the court order to show his dodgy data.

There can be little doubt that upon the BC Supreme Court ruling that Mann did commit data fraud, over in Washington DC, the EPA’s Scott Pruitt will feel intense pressure from skeptics to initiate a full investigation into Mann, his university and all those conspiring to perpetuate a trillion-dollar carbon tax-raising sting on taxpayers.”


Published on Mar 6, 2018

Published on Dec 19, 2017

Confused about climate change?

30.000+ scientists against the idea of man made global warming.

“Signatories are approved for inclusion in the Petition Project list if they have obtained formal educational degrees at the level of Bachelor of Science or higher in appropriate scientific fields. The petition has been circulated only in the United States.

The current list of petition signers includes 9,029 PhD; 7,157 MS; 2,586 MD and DVM; and 12,715 BS or equivalent academic degrees. Most of the MD and DVM signers also have underlying degrees in basic science. “


Published on Jul 22, 2014

Global Warming; 31,487 Scientists say NO to Alarm

Published on Jan 10, 2015

Tim Ball – The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science

Published on Feb 8, 2017

Climategate II, NOAA Whistleblower, Exclusive Background
“NOAA breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.”

Climategate II, NOAA Whistleblower, Exclusive Background

Published on Feb 4, 2017


Published on Aug 6, 2015

“Canadian Senate Hearing on Climate Change, 15th Decenber, 2011
Professor Ross McKitrick
Professor Timothy Patterson
Professor Jan Veizer
Professor Ian Clark
These four professors explain the science of climate change in words of one syllable to skeptical Senators.”

4 Professors Explain the Science of Climate Change

At page 75 of the report or page 86 of the PDF.


More reports by the Club of Rome at https://www.clubofrome.org/activities/reports/

Published on Jan 26, 2018

Here we see four former NASA scientists trash the global warming hysteria.
Dr Hal Doiron
Leighton Steward
Tom Wysmuller
Walter Cunningham

Back in the days when NASA was a genuine scientific organisation, and did real science, such as moon trips, these four men worked there. They represent a group of 25 former NASA scientists / astronauts, who now run the climate realist website: https://www.therightclimatestuff.com/

25 NASA Scientists Question the Sanity of the Global Warmists

“Arctic Temperatures were warmer in the Medieval Warm Period compared to those occurring now in our Modern Warm Period.

A paper published January 2014 in “Global and Planetary Change” reconstructs temperatures in the Arctic circle over the past 1,600 years revealing that the Arctic was warmer during the Medieval Warm Period than it is presently, affirming there is nothing occuring out of the ordinary now. The paper also affirms that the Medieval Warm Period was global.”


Published on Feb 10, 2019

“The US has by far the best temperature data set in the world. It is also the most heavily tampered with and manipulated by government agencies. In this video I show how 61% of the data is now fake.”

61% Fake Data

Published on Dec 11 & Dec 16, 2018

“This is the first of a series of videos exposing the dishonest practices of the government scientists who wrote the 2018 National Climate Assessment. They have an agenda, and the agenda has nothing to do with informing the public about climate.”
Fraud In The National Climate Assessment (Part 1)

Fraud In The National Climate Assessment (Part 1)
Fraud In The National Climate Assessment (Part 2)
Fraud In The National Climate Assessment (Part 3)

Published February 27th, 2019

“New Santer Study: 97% Consensus is now 99.99997%
The new Santer et al. study merely shows that the satellite data have indeed detected warming (not saying how much) that the models can currently only explain with increasing CO2 (since they cannot yet reproduce natural climate variability on multi-decadal time scales).

That’s all.

But we already knew that, didn’t we? So why publish a paper that goes to such great lengths to demonstrate it with an absurdly exaggerated statistic such as 1 in 3.5 million (which corresponds to 99.99997% confidence)? I’ll leave that as a rhetorical question for you to ponder.T

There is so much that should be said, it’s hard to know where to begin.

Current climate models are programmed to only produce human-caused warming”

Published Mar 11, 2007

“Scientists who questioned mankind’s impact on climate change have received death threats and claim to have been shunned by the scientific community.

They say the debate on global warming has been “hijacked” by a powerful alliance of politicians, scientists and environmentalists who have stifled all questioning about the true environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions.

Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five deaths threats by email since raising concerns about the degree to which man was affecting climate change.

One of the emails warned that, if he continued to speak out, he would not live to see further global warming.”

Published on Mars 7, 2019

“It is the biggest lie since people thought the Earth was at the center of the universe. This is Galileo-type stuff. If you remember, Galileo discovered that the sun was at the center of the solar system and the Earth revolved around it. He was sentenced to death by the Catholic Church, and only because he recanted was he allowed to live in house arrest for the rest of his life.

So this was around the beginning of what we call the Enlightenment, when science became the way in which we gained knowledge instead of using superstition and instead of using invisible demons and whatever else, we started to understand that you have to have observation of actual events and then you have to repeat those observations over and over again, and that is basically the scientific method.”


Published on March 3, 2019

“The propagandists are in overdrive shoving “climate grief” down our collective throats. And the next step in that indoctrination, the acceptance of climate eugenics to atone for our climate sins, is almost here. Join James for this week’s important edition of #PropagandaWatch dissecting the dangerous lies that are being pushed in the name of the environment.”

Published March 11, 2019

“Where Did This Come From?

In a recent article, Megan Beets reports that

The modern environmentalist movement, to which so many deluded people in the West today pay obeisance, was never a grassroots movement of concerned youth, and never had anything to do with saving the Earth. It was created and promoted from the beginning by the British Empire to stop development: as a depopulation policy.
Emerging out of the eugenics movement, which became somewhat unpopular in the wake of Hitler’s genocide, the re-branded “ecology” or “conservation” movement continued the goal of maintaining the pre-war colonial system in the post-WWII world.
In 1968, money from some of the biggest oligarchical families in the West was deployed to found the Club of Rome, which declared,

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill….But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap of mistaking symptoms for causes…. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

In parallel the United Nations sponsored a series of conferences on population in the mid-1970s to promote the idea that human population growth is a cancer on the planet, and launched the hoax of “sustainable development.””

Yes there is man made climate change going on, I am 100% sure of it but not because of CO2 but because of manipulated raw data.

1990 IPCC report
2001 IPCC report

Published on May 28, 2019

“UN IPCC Scientist Blows Whistle on Climate Lies

Mörner’s conclusion is that solar activity and its effects on the globe have been the “dominant factor” in what happens to both the climate and the seas.

Meanwhile, the UN claims the current changes in climate and sea level are attributable to human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2).

Man’s emissions of this essential gas, required by plants and exhaled by people, makes up a fraction of one percent of all so-called greenhouse gases present naturally in the atmosphere. “Absolutely not,” Mörner said about the CO2 argument, noting there was “something basically sick” in the blame-CO2 hypothesis. “CO2, if it has any effect, it is minute — it does not matter. What has a big effect is the sun.”

Obviously, while he was serving on the UN IPCC, Mörner tried to warn his colleagues on the UN body that the politically backed hypothesis about CO2 driving temperature changes, and the subsequent claims regarding dangerous sea-level rise, were totally incorrect.

“They just ignored what I was saying,” he recounted. “If they were clever — if they had facts on their hands — they could show that, ‘no, you’re wrong.’ But that is not the case. They just will not discuss it. I will try to discuss it. I will show with their own data that they are wrong. Because in science, we discuss. We don’t forbid or neglect.”

When asked about the frequently repeated (and easily debunked) claims of an alleged 97-percent consensus supporting the man-made global-warming hypothesis, Mörner said it was simply not true — and even if it were, it would be irrelevant.”


Published on Jun 5, 2019

“In this video I document how the New York Times is rewriting their own climate history, and making claims which are the exact opposite of reality – as well as the opposite of their own past reporting.”

New York Times Rewriting Their Own Climate History

Published between May 19-Jul 22, 2019

Climate Science 1 revealed that our atmosphere is not like a greenhouse; instead it’s the exact opposite – it’s capable of expansion and convection.
Climate Science 2 explored the science and the climate cycles which the IPCC forgot to mention, and how they are totally controlling all current climate change. We find that there actually is no ‘extra’ warming that we need to invoke a supposed ‘greenhouse effect’ from CO2 or other ‘greenhouse gases’ to fill.
Climate Science 3 looks into the claim that Venus is hot because of the ‘greenhouse effect’ of carbon dioxide.
Climate Science 4 looks into the ice core record for CO2, and critically examines whether it is correct or not.

This is the fifth in my Climate Science series debunking the so-called ‘greenhouse effect’. Climate Science 5; The IPCCs Forcing Estimates are Wrong Too.

Climate Science 5; The IPCC’s Forcing Estimates are Wrong Too

Climate Science 6; CO2, CH4 “Do not cause measurable warming” Podcast by Dr Holmes
Climate Science 7; Bringing Real Empirical Science into the Climate Debate

Published on Jun 24, 2019

“NASA and NOAA have recently completed another massive round of temperature data tampering, cooling the past oce again, and warming recent temperatures once again. I discuss data tampering and implications of what is being done.”

Data Tampering Past The Climate Tipping Point

Published on Jul 15, 2019

“US wildfire burn acreage is down 80% over the last eighty years. In this video, I show how climate alarmists have made up absurd excuses to ignore the inconvenient historical data.”

Hiding The Decline In Fire Burn Acreage

Published on Dec 10, 2015

Dr. Patrick Moore outlines the facts about ocean acidification.

Ocean Acidification – The Facts – Dr Patrick Moore

Published on Sep 22, 2014

“3/26/2013 Presentation by Dr Don Easterbrook to Washington State Senate Committee on Climate Change — In addition to evidence contrary to IPCC, Dr. Easterbrook alleges media bias and manipulation of data by East Anglia, NASA, NOAA and NSF.”

Man made global warming and ocean acidification thoroughly and scientifically discredited

Published on Aug 2, 2019

Cherry Picking Season Arrives In Greenland

Published on Aug 13, 2019

“In this video, I show how NOAA and NASA create the appearance of warming – by contaminating rural temperature data with bad data from Urban Heat Islands.”

How Homogenization Destroys Climate Science

Published on Aug 12, 2019

“Celebrities, activists, environmentalist organizations, the UN, government entities and sadly, even the Vatican support the theory that humans cause climate change. However, in this exclusive interview, “global warming” expert and author Marc Morano gives you hard-hitting arguments and facts that dispel the artificial fear propagated by “climate emergency” alarmists.

Marc Morano talks about:
#Climate #change (min 2:58)
Population control (min 14:24)
Global warming (min 17:12)
Medieval warm period (min 19:37)
Best arguments against climate change (min 33:03)
The fake 97% scientific consensus (min 34:17)
The Green New Deal (min 38:23)
Pope Francis and Laudato Si (min 48:11 )
Socialism and environmentalism (min 51:27)
His book, Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change (min 57:38)”

How to Destroy the Climate Change Hoax

Published on Aug 28, 2019

“NASA and NOAA (in conjunction with other supposedly independent agencies) have rewritten the temperature history of Iceland many times in order to suit their current political agenda.”

Rewriting Iceland

Published on Aug 24, 2019

“Two Out Of Two Major Court Wins By Ball Versus Junk IPCC Scientists

Dr. Ball, now affirmed as a courageous champion of honest science, has assured his place in the history of climate science. His gift to the world was giving up nine of his senior years, when he could have been enjoying his retirement, to exposing key players in the biggest scientific fraud of all time.

People too easily forget Dr. Ball has defeated in expensive legal battles not just one top UN IPCC climate scientists, but two!

This latest victory is the second this champion of climate skepticism has enjoyed in the last 18 months in this same jurisdiction – both for “defamation,” both multi-million dollar climate science claims.”

Published on Aug 25, 2019

“The Brexit Party’s Christopher Monckton talks to investigative journalist Gemma O’Doherty and discusses a new study by Ronan & Michael Connolly showing that the greenhouse gas effect cannot cause global warming which he says backed up his own findings:
Re-evaluating the role of solar variability on Northern Hemisphere temperature trends since the 19th century

Christopher Monckton: New Irish study shows greenhouse gas effect cannot cause global warming

Published on Sep 20, 2019

“This is my most concise expose of climate fraud. Please pass it around to everyone you know and your elected officials. The video is short, but cuts right to the heart of the matter.”

My Gift To Climate Alarmists

Published on Sep 27, 2019

“Matthew Ogden and Benjamin Deniston cover the significance of the UN’s latest climate change fraud summit, and the release of Executive Intelligence Review’s new special report, “CO₂ Reduction Is a Mass Murder Policy: Designed by Wall Street and the City of London.” The real issue is what LaRouche said decades ago, there are no limits to grown, and it’s time to end the killer Malthusian delusions.”

Report: CO₂ Reduction’ Is a Mass Murder Policy

Published on Oct 4, 2019

“Climate scientists who speak out against the orthodoxy are treated in much the same way as those who spoke out against the geocentricism consensus of 16th century. Climate alarmists are taking science back to the Dark Ages.”

The Climate Inquisition

Published on Mar, 2010

“In this annotated edition of the Climategate emails, John Costella shows us how a very small cabal of climate scientists, based at the University of East Anglia and at Penn State University, were able to control the temperature record fed into the IPCC reports and which comprised the foundation on which the whole global warming structure was based. The only data base which they could not influence was the satellite measured temperature data which John Christy and Roy Spencer, from the University of Alabama, had established from 1979 on.That this was a real conspiracy is beyond argument.

The word “conspiracy” is used by the players themselves. In any conspiracy there is a tight inner core and then successive rings of collaborators, who accept the leadership of the central core.”


Published on Jun 19, 2010

“But we must be aware that carbon dioxide itself is not a pollutant. On the contrary, it is indispensable for life on our planet.

In recent decades, a thesis has spread that the heating of the Earth’s surface of around 0.9 ° C observed from 1850 onwards would be anomalous and caused exclusively by human activities, in particular by the emission of CO2 from the use of fossil fuels in the atmosphere. . This is the thesis of anthropic global warming promoted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the United Nations, whose consequences would be environmental changes so serious as to fear enormous damage in an imminent future, unless drastic and costly mitigation measures do not are immediately adopted. In this regard, many nations of the world have joined programs to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and are pressed, even by a throbbing propaganda, to adopt increasingly demanding programs whose implementation, which involves heavy burdens on the economies of the individual member states, it would depend on climate control and, therefore, the “salvation” of the planet.

However, the anthropic origin of global warming is an unproven hypothesis, deduced only from some climate models, that is complex computer programs, called General Circulation Models .

On the contrary, the scientific literature has increasingly highlighted the existence of a natural climatic variability that the models are not able to reproduce. This natural variability explains a substantial part of global warming observed since 1850. The anthropic responsibility for climate change observed in the last century is therefore unjustifiably exaggerated and catastrophic predictions are not realistic. “

Climate, a counter-current petition
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’

Published on Oct 9, 2019

“In this video, I show how NASA/CSIRO create their fake sea level graphs.”

How NASA Creates Fake Sea Level Rise

Published on Oct 9, 2019

“The latest version of NOAA’s Global Historical Climatology Network, is the crowning achievement of a decades long effort to rewrite Earth’s history and hide the heat of the past.”

Data Tampering Complete – Mission Accomplished!

Published on Oct 14, 2019

“In this video I do a simple experiment which demonstrates that NASA’s global temperature graph does not accurately represent Earth’s temperature history. It is the first of a series.”

The Knockout Punch

Published on Oct 16, 2019

“Normally I focus on corruption of the surface temperature record, but the satellite record has been corrupted in exactly the same way.”

Corruption Of The Satellite Record

Published on Oct 29, 2018

“Former expert reviewer for IPCC, Dr. Madhav Khandekar, denounces man-made climate change scare narrative, says “warming due to human activity is minimal at best.”

Dr. Madhav Khandekar holds a Ph D in Meteorology from the Florida State University USA (1968) and an M Sc in Statistics from Pune University India (1957). Khandekar has been in the field of weather and climate science for over 60 years and has published well over 150 papers, reports, book reviews and scientific commentaries. His current interest is global weather anomalies and extremes and their possible linkage to climate change. He retired as a Research Scientist at Environment Canada in 1997 and lives in Toronto.”

Former IPCC Scientist Refutes New Climate Change Report

Published in 2005

“Michael Crichton’s book State of Fear addresses the politicization of science, in particular the topics of climate change and global warming, through the vehicle of a novel. In the author’s opinion, Crichton is correct: the field of climate research has become highly politicized. An example is provided by the revisionist efforts of some researchers to extinguish the existence of a Medieval Warm Period. The politicization of science is a threat to the process of free inquiry necessary for human progress.”

Published Oct 31, 2019

“In this video I document the remarkably rapid transition from the global cooling scare to the global warming scare during the early 1980s, and how the climate science community has tried to cover it up.”

The Big Switch

Published on 6 Nov, 2019

“Sky News host Andrew Bolt says we have experienced “another day, another big global warming scare”, one which he describes as being nothing more than a “con”.”

New ‘big global warming scare’ is simply a ‘con’

Here is the list of signatories

Published on Nov 26, 2019

“If you are under the impression that I don’t take climate alarmists seriously, then you are correct.”

The Cure For Climate Alarmism

Published on Sep 26, 2019

“Here in Nakamura, we have a highly qualified and experienced climate modeler with impeccable credentials rejecting the unscientific bases of the climate crisis claims. But he’s up against it — activists are winning at the moment, and they’re fronted by scared, crying children; an unstoppable combination, one that’s tricky to discredit without looking like a heartless bastard (I’ve tried).”

Published on Dec 6, 2019

“Global warming hysteria is based around a misunderstanding of the relationship between carbon dioxide and temperature.”

The Fundamental Error Behind Climate Alarmism

Published on Dec 9, 2019

“Interview 1500 – Marc Morano Debunks a Decade of Climategate Lies
It’s been a decade since the leak of emails from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia exposed the lies, obfuscations and dirty tricks behind the climate change orthodoxy. But although the conversation has long since moved on, there’s still a lot we can learn from the lessons of “Climategate.” Joining us today to reflect on a decade of Climategate lies and where the debate stands today is Marc Morano of ClimateDepot.com.”

Published on Dec 18, 2019

“The Australian Bureau of Meteorology has declared December 17, 2019 to be the hottest day on record in Australia. I examine that claim in this video.”

Fakest Day On Record

Published on January 26, 2020

“A new paper which is being widely promoted, is based on not just one, but two of the worst scientific scams in history.”

“Powerful” Junk Science

Published on Feb 4, 2020

“Global warming. Climate change. Climate weirding. Climate emergency. What’s in a name? A lot, apparently. So much so, in fact, that the advertising execs over at Ad Age are openly wondering whether they can “rebrand” climate change so it sounds scarier. Yipee!”

Published on Feb 5, 2020

“People frequently ask me how and why NOAA alters US temperature data, to turn cooling into warming. In this video I show what they are doing, and how it bears no resemblance to what they claim they are doing.”

The Superbowl Of Data Tampering

Published on Feb 18, 2020

“Every day we are bombarded with meaningless junk science and propaganda about climate. This video shows how journalists and academics defraud the public about sea level.”

Drowning In Sea Level Fraud

Published on Feb 24, 2020

“It’s very refreshing to hear politicians speak the truth about things which today is as rare as it can get.

“Cormann admits to relying on discredited reports

Senator Malcolm Roberts received confirmation today that the Government relies on discredited reports from the United Nations as a basis for its climate policies.

Independent scientists and its own authors have condemned this UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Senator Roberts said “Neither the government nor CSIRO has performed due diligence on the UN climate reports, to ensure these are accurate and reflect the full body of scientific literature.”

“And yet the government uses these one-sided UN political reports as the basis for spending billions of dollars on renewables projects and nationwide green taxes,” he added.

Senator Roberts has spent a decade researching the core UN IPCC science chapters which purport to show the cause and effect relationship between human carbon dioxide and temperature.

“These core science chapters replace empirical scientific evidence with subjective garbage-in garbage-out climate models” said Senator Roberts.

The IPCC report relies heavily on erroneous climate models that have not been validated and falsely assume that human carbon dioxide is the main driver.

“This is a failure of science and it is alarming that politicians rely on these flawed models to build a billion dollar climate economy; this is a travesty,” stated Senator Roberts.

“This goes to the core of our country’s governance that is based on corrupt socialist UN policies which are de-industrialising our country and gutting our nation,’ said Senator Roberts.

“If the UN IPCC were a corporation, an accountant or financial institution, it would belted for fraudulent, misleading and deceptive conduct,” he added.

One Nation calls on the government to immediately set up an independent review of climate science which will rely solely on empirically-based scientific evidence.”

United Nations reports fail science test
Other places to find me: